Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Cage v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv13797
Plaintiff:
Harold Cage
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, Richard Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cage #244367 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00231
Plaintiff:
Harold Winfield Cage #244367
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, Richard Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bowen v. Richard Cady, et al
as 10-1533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. BOWEN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD CADY and V MCCABE
David Bowen v. Richard Cady, et al
as 10-1333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. BOWEN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD CADY and V MCCABE
Cameron Fitts v. Sherry Burt, et al
as 09-1672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAMERON FITTS
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERRY L. BURT, Warden, KENNETH MACEACHERN, JOHN O. CIVIEJA, Deputy Warden and others
Defendant:
PAMLER, Deputy Warden, JAMES TRETHEWAY, Ex-ADW and DENNIS GRIM, Ex-RUM
Bowen v. Cady et al
as 2:2009cv10414
Plaintiff:
David L Bowen
Defendant:
Richard Cady and V. McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Hardy v. Cabrera, et al
as 08-2020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
CABRERA, Dr. - M.D. - Parnall Corr. Facility, CADY, Rec. Gym Director at Parnall Corr. Facility, CHRISTIAN SODERMAN, ADW and others
Bowen #482624 v. Cady et al
as 2:2008cv00181
Plaintiff:
David L. Bowen #482624
Defendant:
Richard Cady and V. McCabe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robert Cady v. Arenac County, et al
as 08-1795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WARD CADY
Defendant - Appellee:
ARENAC COUNTY and CURTIS G. BROUGHTON, an individual and in his official capacity as Arenac County Prosecutor
Fitts #198867 v. Burt et al
as 2:2008cv00085
Plaintiff:
Cameron Fitts #198867
Defendant:
Sherry L. Burt, Kenneth Maceachern, John O. Civieja and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
