Cases 41 - 50 of 372
Baker v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv10230
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Prison Health Services, Incorporated and others
Gresham v. Romanowsky et al
as 2:2012cv15489
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham
Defendant:
Kenneth Romanowsky, Dan Heyns, Darrel M Stewart and others
Bennett v. Correctional Medical Services
as 1:2012cv15405
Plaintiff:
Neil Bennett
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Eddie Wagle v. MDOC, et al
as 12-2526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE WAGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA CARUSO, PATRICIA BARNHART and others
Roberto Casanova v. MDOC, et al
as 12-2487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERTO ANTONIO CASANOVA
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC., SCOTT HOLMES, Dr. and others
Robert Bruce v. Correctional Medical Service
as 12-6360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT VAUGHN BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.
Samuel Coleman v. Robert Naples, et al
as 12-2427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL LEON COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT NAPLES, Warden, JEFFREY C. STIEVE, MD, Chief Medical Officer,, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC., a foreign profit corporation, and others
Jerry VanDiver v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 12-2329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY VANDIVER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., CRAIG HUTCHINSON, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Carmichael v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2012cv13594
Plaintiff:
Karlos Carmichael
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Nick Ludwick, Scott L Holmes and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
