Cases 41 - 50 of 463
Curry v. Bostik, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CURRY
Defendant:
BOSTIK, INC., ARKEMA INC. and Arkema, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ronald Curry v. David Gray
as 22-3546
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD CURRY
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID W. GRAY, Warden
Curry v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
Martez Darrell Curry
Defendant:
Karl Jackson, Kent Treece, FNU Kissell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02282
Plaintiff:
Avery B. Smith and Rosalind Curry
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv11167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Banerian, et al v. Jocelyn Benson, et al
as 22-1399
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BANERIAN, MICHON BOMMARITO, PETER COLOVOS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOCELYN BENSON, Secretary of State, DOUGLAS CLARK, Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission, JUANITA CURRY, Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission and others
In re: Leanne Walters, et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Company, et al
as 22-1385
Not Classified By Court:
In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEANNE WALTERS, C. B., C. BJ. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE & COMPANY, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INC.
USA v. Jessica Curry
as 22-5366
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JESSICA CURRY
Curry v. Mehr et al
as 1:2022cv01070
Plaintiff:
Christopher Curry, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff John Mehr and Mayor Scott Conger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
