Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Wright v. Whiteville Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2017cv01083
Plaintiff:
Winfred Wright
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility, Matthews, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronnie Bradfield v. Grady Perry, et al
as 17-5450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE BRADFIELD, aka Paul Farnsworth
Defendant - Appellee:
GRADY PERRY, Warden, L. BROWN, grievance chairperson, SANDRA GATES and others
Lee et al v. Genesis Hospital et al
as 2:2017cv00312
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee and Isabelle Lee
Defendant:
Genesis Hospital , Andrew Guglielmi, William Wallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lynn et al v. HealthSource of Ohio Batavia OB/GYN et al
as 1:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Lynn and Charles Behymer
Defendant:
HealthSource of Ohio Batavia OB/GYN , Sherry Johnson , Jeffrey Lubow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McDougald v. Erdos et al
as 1:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Jerone McDougald
Defendant:
Ron Erdos, William Cool, Brad Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Matthews v. Terpta, et al
as 17-5137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE W. MATTHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
TERPTA, DANIELS, Dentist, JOHN DOE, Health Administrator and others
Roy Durham, Jr. v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 17-3007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY A. DURHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, ROB L. JEFFREYS, Warden, L C COVAL and others
Rucker v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
Morris Rucker
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, (f/n/u) Franks, Joe Doe Nurses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faulkner v. Phillips et al
as 3:2016cv00549
Plaintiff:
David Faulkner
Defendant:
Shawn Phillips, Gary Hamby, Jeff Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDougald v. Eaches et al
as 1:2016cv00900
Plaintiff:
Jerone McDougald
Defendant:
Jeremy Eaches, Haywood, G. Grooms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
