Cases 41 - 50 of 273
Goudlock v. Fuller et al
as 3:2022cv02199
Plaintiff:
Jason Goudlock
Defendant:
Lt. Fuller, Mullinex, Juan Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Henderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv02119
Plaintiff:
Neal Henderson
Defendant:
Commisioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lawrence v. Henderson
as 1:2022cv02088
Petitioner:
Howard Lawrence
Respondent:
Warden Kim Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDaniel v. Henderson
as 3:2022cv02051
Petitioner:
shannon Mcdaniel
Respondent:
Warden and Warden Kimberly Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Henderson v. Jackson-Mitchell
as 4:2022cv01851
Petitioner:
Jordan S. Henderson
Respondent:
Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv00585
Petitioner:
Jordan S. Henderson
Respondent:
Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willis v. Henderson
as 1:2022cv01727
Petitioner:
Courtney Willis
Respondent:
Warden Kim Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Easterling, r v. Afzal et al
as 3:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling, r
Defendant:
Kamron Afzal, Thomas Hagel and Carl Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolbert v. City of Cleveland Ohio et al
as 1:2022cv01489
Plaintiff:
Antoine Tolbert
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Sergeant Henderson, Officer # 2155 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
