Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Toikka et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2012cv00204
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Toikka and Marjorie E. Reeder
Defendant:
James Wendall Jones, David Gallenstein, Dana Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
USA v. James Jones, Jr.
as 12-3855
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES DOUGLAS JONES, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
In Re Invacare Derivative Litigation
as 1:2012cv00259
Defendant:
Dan T. Moore, III, C. Martin Harris, Dale C. LaPorte and others
Plaintiff:
Colleen Witmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris Research, Inc. v. Jones
as 2:2012mc00008
Plaintiff:
Harris Research, Inc.
Defendant:
James E. Jones, Jr.
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
James B Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
James Jones, Jr. v. Tony Hall, et al
as 11-6314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. JONES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY HALL, JOEY MATTINA and JANE DOE, Officer
Jones v. Dotson et al
as 1:2011cv01301
Plaintiff:
James A Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
S. Dotson, Severson, Beavers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Lansing Police and Fire Retirement System v. Blouch et al
as 1:2011cv01893
Defendant:
Gerald B. Blouch , Aaron Malachi Mixon, III , Joseph B. Richey, II and others
Plaintiff:
City of Lansing Police and Fire Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 301
Dublin Eye Associates, P.C. et al v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
as 5:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
Dublin Eye Associates, P.C. , Roger D. Smith and James Y. Jones
Defendant:
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company and Thomas Ackerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
