Cases 41 - 50 of 110
Franklin v. Casagrande et al
as 1:2017cv01020
Plaintiff:
Cletus John Robert Franklin
Defendant:
Cynthia Casagrande, FNU Bills, FNU Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson et al v. Martin et al
as 2:2016cv14197
Plaintiff:
Rufus Deon Wilson and John Robert Davis
Defendant:
Michael C. Martin, Labron Edward Nunn, Joseph C. Nether and others
Demos v. Kraft Foods Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02833
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Kraft Foods Inc., Dole Food Co. Inc., Yum Brands Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv02813
Plaintiff:
John Robert Day
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Depositors Insurance Company et al v. Lennox Industries Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv13509
Defendant:
Lennox Industries Inc. and Regal-Beloit Corporation
Plaintiff:
Depositors Insurance Company , John Roberts-Kinyon and Melissa Roberts-Kinyon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Cletus Franklin v. Dustin Chumley, et al
as 16-6380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLETUS JOHN ROBERT FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DUSTIN CHUMLEY, WTSP Sergeant and Disciplinary Hearing Officer, JAMES ERIC HOLLOWAY, Warden, WTSP, DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Tennessee Department of Correction (TDOC) Commissioner and others
Rawls #211542 v. Washington
as 2:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
John Robert Rawls #211542
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rawls #211542 v. Corizon Health, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
John Robert Rawls #211542
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin et al v. Bryant et al
as 2:2016cv02107
Plaintiff:
Cletus John Robert Franklin and Michael Anthony McPherson
Defendant:
William Bryant, Stanley Dickerson, James Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos et al v. Proctor & Gamble
as 1:2015cv00620
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos and Society of T.R.U.T.H.
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
