Cases 41 - 50 of 3,283
Acrisure, LLC v. Kelly et al
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Acrisure, LLC
Defendant:
Matthew Kelly, Christopher Iovino, Robert Kempner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Kelly v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01406
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kelly
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nicholls et al v. Change Healthcare Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Karyn Nicholls, Soumendu Das, Rose Harris and others
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc., Optum Inc. and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Kelly v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Kelly
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America of v. Kelly
as 2:2024mc50276
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Stanley Kelly
Spina et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
William Spina and Kelly Spina
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Agness McCury, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5208
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5196
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
