Cases 41 - 50 of 166
Keith Judd v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-4611
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Director, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO, et al.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-6524
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Childress v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv14708
Plaintiff:
Robert Childress, Jr
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin, J S Walton and others
Wellington v. Lappin
as 6:2010cv00321
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wellington
Defendant:
Director Harley Lappin, Harrell Watts, C. Eichenlaub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Jones v. M. Daniels, et al
as 10-6408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
M. DANIELS, KITCHENS, T. DOOLIN and others
Parker v. Hickey et al
as 5:2010cv00392
Plaintiff:
Troy Parker
Defendant:
Deborah A. Hickey, Rob Nagel, C. Eichenlaub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Judd v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-4375
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO, et al.
Keith Judd v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-4377
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO, et al.
Keith Judd v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-4374
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Respondent - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW MEXICO, et al.
Phillippe' Smith v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-6235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIPPE' L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, VIAZ, KLUTE, Correctional Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
