Cases 41 - 50 of 450
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Jason Kutchinski v. Freeland Community School District, et al
as 22-1748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON KUTCHINSKI, as parent and next friend to H.K., a minor
Defendant / Appellee:
FREELAND COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, MATTHEW A. CAIRY, in his official and individual capacity and TRACI L. SMITH, in her official and individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Reed, et al v. USA
as 22-5493
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. REED, Individually, as surviving spouse and next of kin of Constance M. Reed, deceased, and as surviving parent of Chloe E. Reed and Lillian D. Reed, deceased and JAMES L. ENGLAND, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5417
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5317
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5268
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Karey Arnold, et al v. USA
as 22-5003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREY GORDON ARNOLD, as Parent and Next of Kin of deceased, Chasity R. Walker and ALLEN DALE WALKER, as Parent and Next of Kin of deceased, Chasity R. Walker
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
