Cases 41 - 50 of 261
Ward v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04949
Plaintiff:
Sanford Ward, II
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dominic Sanford v. Mullins, et al
as 19-2255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOMINIC SANFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
JOANN BUNTING, Medical Supervisor, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MULLINS, NURSE CAFIERO and others
Sanford v. McDonald et al
as 2:2019cv13102
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Tyler John McDonald
Plaintiff:
Lisa Sanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kilfoyle v. Hill et al
as 1:2019cv01831
Defendant:
Lifetime Financial Growth of Northern Ohio, LLC, Matthew W. Roddy, Tasha J Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Kilfoyle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cecilia Lakin, et al v. Bloomin' Brands, Inc., et al
as 19-1880
Defendant / Appellee:
BLOOMIN' BRANDS, INC., OSI/FLEMINGS, LLC, dba Flemings Prime Steakhouse and LATONYA JOPLIN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANFORD LAKIN
Plaintiff:
CECILIA LAKIN
Walker v. Henry Ford Health System et al
as 2:2019cv12343
Defendant:
Original Tear Group, Steven Rand, Ashley J. Friess and others
Plaintiff:
Joe David Walker
City of Sanford, Florida v. Purdue Pharma L.P.., et al
as 1:2019op45599
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Sanford, Florida
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Sanford v. CoreCivic et al
as 1:2019cv01139
Plaintiff:
Gerald A. Sanford, Sr.
Defendant:
CoreCivic and Aaron Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford v. CoreCivic et al
as 3:2019cv00546
Plaintiff:
Gerald A. Sanford, Sr.
Defendant:
CoreCivic and Aaron Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davontae Sanford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 19-1612
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES TOLBERT, in their individual capacities, jointly and severally, and MICHAEL RUSSELL
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVONTAE SANFORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
