Cases 41 - 50 of 100
USA v. R. Sinclair
as 16-3784
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
R. ALLEN SINCLAIR, aka Raymond A. Sinclair
Martin v. Sinclair Community College et al
as 4:2016cv01074
Plaintiff:
William E. Martin
Defendant:
Sinclair Community College, ACI Regional School Principal, Steven Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinclair v. USA
as 2:2016cv11000
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Durand Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sinclair v. CashCall, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00456
Plaintiff:
Gordon Sinclair
Defendant:
CashCall Inc., WS Funding, LLC, Delbert Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Van Jenkins v. MDOC, et al
as 16-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAN JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PAROLE BOARD, ABSCONDER RECOVERY UNIT and others
Smith v. Bi-State Compact Commission, Illinois/Michigan et al
as 2:2015cv14026
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Bi-State Compact Commission, Illinois/Michigan, Interstate Commission on Adult Offenders Supervision, Hagerman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv13789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cheryl Sinclair v. Lauderdale County, TN, et al
as 15-6134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERYL DARLENE SINCLAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
LAUDERDALE COUNTY, TENNESSEE, CLAY ALAN NEWMAN and STEVEN SANDERS, Sheriff
Sinclair et al v. Jimenez et al
as 2:2015cv12697
Plaintiff:
Jim Sinclair , Patricia Sinclair , Rebel Scrap Metal, LLC and others
Defendant:
Alfredo Jimenez, Jonathan Parnell, Derek Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sinclair v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv01092
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Sue Sinclair
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
