Cases 41 - 50 of 59
USA v. Michael Stahl
as 11-3911
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. STAHL
Day et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00305
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Day , Leonard Haslag , James McCormick and others
Defendant:
Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., Paul C. Orberson, Jeff Orberson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Toomey et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2010cv00260
Plaintiff:
Judith Toomey
Defendant:
United States of America, Meadowview Regional Medical Center, LLC, LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Stahl v. Knight et al
as 1:2010cv00649
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Stahl
Defendant:
Connie Knight, Donald Knight, Steve Vargos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-4471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stahl v. Czernik
as 5:2009cv14266
Plaintiff:
John Curtis Stahl
Defendant:
Phil Czernik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Lyon v. Ferguson et al
as 5:2009cv00215
Plaintiff:
James D. Lyon and James D. Lyon
Defendant:
Tony P. Ferguson, S. David Plummer, Spencer D. Plummer, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stahl v. Bad Axe, City of et al
as 1:2009cv11682
Plaintiff:
Susanne M Stahl
Defendant:
Bad Axe, City of and John Nugent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Elliott et al v. Innosource, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00782
Plaintiff:
Carol Elliott, Carol Elliott, Carol Elliott and others
Defendant:
Innosource, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Filing Error
as 5:2009cv00781
Plaintiff:
Carol Elliott, Bob Hunsche and Patricia Stahl
Defendant:
Innosource, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
