Cases 41 - 50 of 139
Smith et al v. Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00611
Plaintiff:
Bethany L. Smith and Wallace L. Smith
Defendant:
Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. , Roadrunner Intermodal Services, LLC , Morgan Southern, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Schuelke
as 3:2016cv01667
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Smith , Sumner County Regional Airport Authority , Harold Van Leeuwen, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Dennis Schuelke
Counter_plaintiff:
Dennis Schuelke
Counter_defendant:
Don Drayton , Harold Van Leeuwen, Jr. , Mark T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Norfolk Cnty Retirement System, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 16-6059
Plaintiff:
NORFOLK COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, NEW YORK CITY TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, NEW YORK CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT PENSION FUND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., WAYNE T. SMITH and W. LARRY CASH
Smith et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2016cv11882
Plaintiff:
Nikita T Smith and Kevin D Thomas
Defendant:
Detroit, City of , John Gaines, John Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Schuelke
as 3:2016cv00722
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Smith , Sumner County Regional Airport Authority , Harold Van Leeuwen, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Dennis Schuelke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Randy Smith
as 16-3197
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RANDY T. SMITH
Tappan v. Haslam et al
as 1:2016cv01025
Plaintiff:
Alton L. Tappan
Defendant:
Bill Haslam, Derrick Schofield, Michael Parris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
