Cases 41 - 50 of 13,135
Buhl v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv12192
Defendant:
Linda S. Hallmark and John Doe
Plaintiff:
John Buhl
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jones v. Bitler et al
as 2:2024cv12172
Defendant:
M. Oaks, John Doe and J. Bitler
Plaintiff:
Arthur Louis Jones
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Rose v. City of Wyandotte et al
as 2:2024cv12156
Defendant:
City of Wyandotte, Police Officer John Doe 1 and Police Officer John Doe 2
Plaintiff:
Jamie Elaine Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02585
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Detective John Doe and Shelby County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Durrell Jordan Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramseur et al v. LifePoint Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Kristina Poytner, Sherea Ramseur, Linda J. Cundall and others
Defendant:
LifePoint Health Retirement Committee, Board of Directors of LifePoint Health, Inc., The, LifePoint Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Doe v. Groulx
as 1:2024cv12129
Defendant:
Patrick Joseph Groulx
Counter-Claimant:
Patrick Joseph Groulx
Counter-Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00987
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Stout v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Izzah Stout
Defendant:
Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stout v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Izzah Stout
Defendant:
Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antwon French v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Justice, LFUCG, et al
as 24-5728
Defendant:
BRIAN GOETTL, BOYD MINNIFIELD, LOU ANNA RED CORN and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWON FRANCOIS FRENCH, A.I.R , minor child of Antwon French
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
