Cases 41 - 50 of 154
Chen Chung v. J. Ormond
as 19-5543
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHEN I. CHUNG
Respondent / Appellee:
J. RAY ORMOND
White et al v. Khan et al
as 2:2019cv02226
Defendant:
Carrie Lynn Stallings, Gina Raymond, Adnan Naseer and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee White and Sharon White
Undetermined:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Boiling Crab Franchise Co., LLC v. Boiling Crab Seafood LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00333
Defendant:
Shaodon Chen and Boiling Crab Seafood LLC
Plaintiff:
Boiling Crab Franchise Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Chung v. Ormond
as 6:2019cv00039
Respondent:
USA and Warden J. Ray Ormond
Petitioner:
Chen I. Chung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chen v. The United States of America
as 1:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Xiafen Chen
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Porter v. LPL Financial LLC et al
as 2:2018mc50592
Plaintiff:
Chistine Porter
Defendant:
LPL Financial LLC, Charles Cheng Zhang , Lynn Ling Chen-Zhang and others
Jardin Hill, LLC et al v. New City Advisors, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00187
Defendant:
Chanyuan You, Bingtao Zhao, Ivan Utera and others
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Chan, Mr. Terry Chan, Jardin Hill, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Phillip M. Hudson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chen, M.D. et al v. Zak, M.D.
as 3:2018cv00283
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Chen, M.D. and Acacia Dermatology, PLLC
Defendant:
Beverly Zak, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510
Shi et al v. Yums Chinese Restaurant. d/b/a/ Yum's Subs et al
as 2:2017cv02900
Plaintiff:
Wei Guo Shi and Li Ming Yan
Defendant:
Yums Chinese Restaurant. d/b/a/ Yum's Subs and Mei Ling Lin aka Mei Ling Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv02283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
