Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Zappone et al v. Daily et al
as 3:2015cv02135
Plaintiff:
Todd N Zappone , Carrie M Zappone , Dustin A Zappone and others
Defendant:
Randall E Neal, Robert Taulbee, Robert Leuenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Hacker v. Lincoln County Detention Cent, et al
as 14-6465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID HACKER
Defendant - Appellee:
LINCOLN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, through the Lincoln County Fiscal Court, WILLIAM D. GOOCH, Jailer, Individually, RODNEY PRICE, Deputy, Individually and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM PLUMMER, who was a prisoner at the Lincoln County Jail at the time of the incident, JASON NAPIER, who was a prisoner at the Lincoln County Jail at the time of the incident and DAVID G. WALLS, who was a prisoner at the Lincoln County Jail at the time of the incident
John Gallo, et al v. Moen, Inc.
as 14-3918
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN L. GALLO, MARY C. SAVAGE, THEODORE J. WALLACE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MOEN, INC.
Richard Madkins v. Henry Steward, et al
as 14-5976
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD E. MADKINS
Defendant:
HENRY STEWARD, sued in his or her individual capacity, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, TDOC, GAYLE RAY, former TDOC Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DOROTHY MURLEY, WTSP Health Service Administrator- sued in his or her individual capacity
John Gallo, et al v. Moen, Inc.
as 14-3633
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN L. GALLO, MARY C. SAVAGE, THEODORE J. WALLACE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MOEN, INC.
Morris & Morris, PSC, et al v. Gayle Slaughter, et al
as 14-5501
Plaintiff:
KEITH RENE GUY, SR., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, BARRY LYNN DEMUS, JR., CHRISTOPHER ANDRE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN DOE IV #1-#37, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JANE DOE IV #1- #6, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JOHN DOE II #1-33 (EXCEPTING #5, 9, 21, 26 & 27), on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MORRIS & MORRIS P.S.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, fka The City Of Lexington, H. FOSTER PETTIT, Individually and official capacity, JAMES AMATO and others
Keith Guy, Sr., et al v. LFUCG, et al
as 14-5496
Plaintiff:
KEITH RENE GUY, SR., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, BARRY LYNN DEMUS, JR., CHRISTOPHER ANDRE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
JOHN DOE IV #1-#37, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JANE DOE IV #1- #6, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JOHN DOE II #1-33 (EXCEPTING #5, 9, 21, 26 & 27), on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class and others
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
REX ROE #48, #62, #91, #97, #103, On behalf of themselves and all others who are similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, fka The City Of Lexington, H. FOSTER PETTIT, in official and individual capacity, JAMES AMATO, Individually and others
Jones v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2014cv02295
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Jones, III
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of TN, Shelby County D.A. Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Friends Who Care, Incorporated et al
as 2:2013cv15147
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Friends Who Care, Incorporated and Gayle Busselle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Transky et al v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission et al
as 1:2013cv02639
Plaintiff:
Gregg Transky and Sondra Borrie
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission , Ohio Attorney General , Delores Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
