Cases 51 - 60 of 505
Wills v. Eaton et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
James A. Wills
Defendant:
Timothy Eaton, K. Monzon, Matthew Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2022cv00774
Plaintiff:
Angel Marie Lucas
Defendant:
Correction Officer Cassidy, Scioto County Sheriff Office, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Burke et al
as 5:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Ann Nicole Henson
Defendant:
Amy Burke, Janet Humphrey-Cole, Megan N. Bosley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Maryville Baptist Church, et al v. Andy Beshear
as 22-5952
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARYVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH and DOCTOR JACK ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDY BESHEAR, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
Andis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Andis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cobble v. Beshear
as 3:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cobble
Defendant:
Andy Beshear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alford v. The Andersons, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Andy Alford
Defendant:
The Andersons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 bc Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Stone v. Spalding et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jackie Wayne Stone
Defendant:
Samuel Todd Spalding, Daniel Cameron and Andy Beshear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Biden et al
as 1:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jackie W. Stone
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Angela Call, Andy Beshear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Burkhead et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jackie Wayne Stone
Defendant:
Brent Burkhead, Andy Beshear, Diane Ford-Benningfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
