Cases 51 - 60 of 573
Dixon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04096
Plaintiff:
Glen C. Dixon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Greene v. Poppenheimer
as 2:2022cv02771
Not Classified By Court:
Cindy Flowers
Plaintiff:
Paulette Greene
Defendant:
Glen Poppenheimer
Mink v. Knoxville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Dusty Lee Mink
Defendant:
Knoxville Police Dept., Knox County Sheriffs Office, Glen Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stacho v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03680
Plaintiff:
Glen Stacho
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mary Cooper v. Glen Oaks Healthcare LLC, et al
as 22-5570
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY ELIZABETH COOPER
Defendant / Appellee:
GLEN OAKS HEALTHCARE LLC, dba Viviant Healthcare of Shelbyville, fka Glen Oaks Health and Rehabilitation and VIVIANT CARE MANAGEMENT LLC
Johnson v. Meyer et al
as 2:2022cv11871
Plaintiff:
Maria Johnson
Defendant:
Glen Meyer and Fair Excavating Co., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Dover Glen Condominium Association v. Oakland County et al
as 2:2022cv11468
Plaintiff:
Dover Glen Condominium Association
Defendant:
Oakland County and Andrew Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Celebration Homes, LLC v. DS Woodbridge Glen Sub, LLC
as 3:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
Celebration Homes, LLC
Defendant:
DS Woodbridge Glen Sub, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nosse v. City of Ann Arbor et al
as 2:2022cv11283
Plaintiff:
Robert Nosse
Defendant:
City of Ann Arbor, Derek Delacourt, Brandon Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Webb v. Worley et al
as 2:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Webb
Defendant:
Amanda Worley, William Ridley, John Tyler Merchant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
