Cases 51 - 60 of 165
Catherman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2015cv00574
Plaintiff:
Susan Catherman
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bates v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 5:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
James L. Bates
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv10805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. Tree-Removal Rights With Respect to Land in McNairy County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2015cv01008
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Tree-Removal Rights With Respect to Land in McNairy County, Tennessee, Bobby Haynes, Mary Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
Leugers et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 3:2014cv02840
Plaintiff:
John J. Leugers and Lucinda Leugers
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gojcaj v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. se et al
as 2:2014cv14825
Plaintiff:
Melissa Gojcaj
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Sauve et al
as 2:2014cv14576
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Matthew Sauve, Mary Sauve, Asset Acceptance, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kimberly Rollick v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 14-6422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIMBERLY GILES ROLLICK
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Baker v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2014cv02187
Plaintiff:
Deryl L. Baker
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
