Cases 51 - 60 of 66
USA v. Monty Hart
as 10-6384
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MONTY HART
Monty Turner v. Joseph Meko
as 10-6082
Petitioner - Appellant:
MONTY KIM TURNER
Respondent - Appellee:
JOSEPH MEKO
Baldridoe et al v. Taylor et al
as 7:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Monty Baldridoe and Tonie Baldridoe
Defendant:
Jeremy T. Taylor
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Teresa Epling
Intervenor_defendant:
Jeremy T. Taylor and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Holkko v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. et al
as 1:2009hc60177
Plaintiff:
Monty O'Dell Holkko
Defendant:
Baxter Healthcare Corp., Baxter International, Inc., Scientific Protein Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ewing et al v. Ashcroft & Oak Fine Jewelers et al
as 1:2009cv00778
Plaintiff:
Andre Ewing, Andre Ewing, Maribeth Ewing and others
Defendant:
Ashcroft & Oak Fine Jewelers, Monica Main, Taylor Dinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reid v. Metro Police Department of Nashville et al
as 3:2009cv00668
Plaintiff:
Keva Reid
Defendant:
Metro Police Department of Nashville and Monty Ray Tester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reid v. Metro Police Department of Nashville et al
as 3:2009mc00160
Plaintiff:
Keva Reid
Defendant:
Metro Police Department of Nashville and Monty Ray Tester
Reynolds v. Abdul et al
as 3:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Monty E Reynolds
Defendant:
Safraz Shan Abdul and OOIDA Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Reynolds v. Abdul et al
as 3:2009cv00198
Plaintiff:
Monty E Reynolds
Defendant:
Safraz Shan Abdul and OOIDA Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hart v. USA
as 6:2008cv07036
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Monty Hart
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
