Cases 61 - 70 of 3,001
Martin v. Henn Lesperance PLC et al
as 1:2024cv00072
Defendant:
Malgorzata Walker, Henn Lesperance PLC, Kevin Lesperance and others
Plaintiff:
Brittany E. Martin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brown v. Cargor et al
as 2:2024cv10208
Plaintiff:
David Jamaal Brown
Defendant:
Kim Cargor, Heidi E Washington and MDOC
Davis v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2024cv10203
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis and Robert Davis [E-filer]
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Alisha Bell, Martha G. Scott and others
Stiff-Brown #587330 v. Coscarelli et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Duane Stiff-Brown #587330
Defendant:
Unknown Coscarelli, Unknown Swanson, Unknown Henning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv10138
Plaintiff:
Kevin La'von Giles
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Dawn Ison, Diane N. Princ and others
Murphy #769317 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Anthony Murphy #769317
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington, Unknown Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
1-800 Water Damage International, LLC v. Restoration RX, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10110
Plaintiff:
1-800 Water Damage International, LLC
Defendant:
Restoration RX, LLC, Gerald E. Cleveland and Jenteal Cleveland
Parker v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2024cv10079
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parker
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Matthew Baranski, John Doe and others
Pennell v. Arrowood et al
as 2:2024cv10045
Plaintiff:
Sharon Marie Pennell
Defendant:
Paul E Arrowood and Bryan L Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pennell v. Arrowood et al
as 1:2024cv10048
Plaintiff:
Sharon Marie Pennell
Defendant:
Paul E Arrowood and Bryan Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
