Cases 61 - 70 of 111
Ohio Council 8 Amer Fedn, et al v. Secretary of State, et al
as 14-3678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OHIO COUNCIL 8 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, HONORABLE NADINE ALLEN, HONORABLE PETER J. CORRIGAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF STATE JENNIFER BRUNNER, In her official capacity as Secretary of State of Ohio, BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO, BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv12145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv10311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Rutherlan Enterprises v. Zettler Hardware et al
as 2:2014cv00019
Plaintiff:
Rutherlan Enterprises
Defendant:
Zettler Hardware, Nicholas Zettler, Substruct Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-6574
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Adair v. Ameridose, LLC.
as 2:2013cv12655
Plaintiff:
Anna Adair , Richard Adair , Martha Asadoorian and others
Defendant:
Ameridose, LLC., Medical Sales Management, Inc, Medical Sales Management SW, Inc and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Corral v. Smith et al
as 1:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Erin Corral
Defendant:
Davida Smith and Bryant & Stratton College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv15233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
