Cases 61 - 70 of 145
Boyce v. Hobkirk et al
as 2:2016cv14395
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Boyce
Defendant:
Robert Hobkirk, Ward Carter, David Rothe and others
Michigan Immigrant Rights Center et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2016cv14192
Plaintiff:
Michigan Immigrant Rights Center , Dr. Geoffrey Alan Boyce , Dr. Elizabeth Oglesby and others
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and Customers and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Estate of Toiana Janae Boyce v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2016cv12707
Plaintiff:
Estate of Toiana Janae Boyce
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Boyce v. USA
as 4:2016cv11988
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Malcolm E Boyce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Merrell et al v. Bedford County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 4:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jerome Merrell
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Dept., Austin Swing, Bedford County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gifford, II v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
David Gifford, II
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee , Bedford County Sheriff's Department , Bedford County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanton et al v. Bedford County Sheriff Dept./Jail et al
as 4:2015cv00014
Plaintiff:
Issac Scott Blanton and Bobby Jerome Merrell
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff Dept./Jail, Austin Swing, Bedford County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gifford v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2015cv00007
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee, Bedford County Correctional Facility, Bedford County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
David Gifford, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
