Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 656
Adkins et al v. Spurlock et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00863
Plaintiff: James L. Adkins, Jr. and Adam Robert Williams
Defendant: Bill Spurlock and Does 1 - 100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matt Schweder, et al v. Andrew Beshear, et al
as 21-6153
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATT SCHWEDER, Individually and as Father and Guardian of P.S., ROBIN HARBOLT, Individually and as Guardian of P.H., LARRY NICHOLS and others
Plaintiff: JANE AND JOHN DOES, 1-100
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW G. BESHEAR, Individually and officially as Governor of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, STEVEN STACK, Individually and in his official capacity as Kentucky Department of Public Health Commissioner,, ERIC FRIEDLANDER, Individually and in his official capacity as Secretary, Cabinet for Health and Family Services, and others
In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation
as 1:2017md02804
Defendant: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: City of Toledo, City of Lorain, County of Cuyahoga and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Allergan Finance LLC, HBC Service Company, Discount Drug Mart, Inc. and others
Interested Party: United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Webb County, TX and others
Intervenor: USA Today, Chicago Tribune Company, Los Angeles Times and others
Special Master: Francis McGovern, David Rosenblum Cohen and Cathy Yanni
Respondent: Linda Singer and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
3Rd Party Defendant: Jane Does, Pfizer Inc., King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Scott County Indiana Board of Commissioners
Counter Claimant: Christopher C. Smith and James Coomer
Not Classified By Court: State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy
Amicus Curiae: Manatee Memorial Hospital, Allegiance Health Center of Ruston, Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville and others
Petitioner: Paul Andrew Pyfer, David B. Gustin, Kenneth Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Vandeven et al v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00056
Defendant: Club Wyndham Access, Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., John Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff: Dana Vandeven and David Vandeven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Necessary v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00214
Plaintiff: Conley Necessary
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and John Does 1-100 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wellday et al v. Promedica Health Systems, Inc., d/b/a Promedica Bixby Hospital et al
as 2:2020cv11776
Defendant: Promedica Health Systems, Inc., d/b/a Promedica Bixby Hospital, Emily Walworth, Emily Siefker and others
Plaintiff: Amy Wellday, JJ, ZW and others
Interested Party: Michael L Pitt and Megan A Bonanni
Tart v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00215
Plaintiff: Lisa Tate Tart, Lisa Tart and Carlton John Tart
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and John Does 1-100 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gray v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00211
Plaintiff: Randall Terrell Gray
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McIntyre v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00213
Plaintiff: Barbara L McIntyre
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and John Does 1-100 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davidson v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00210
Plaintiff: Buford Farris Davidson
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and John Does 1-100 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?