Cases 61 - 70 of 169
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harper v. Christian County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Joshua Eli Harper
Defendant:
Christian County, Kentucky , Brad Boyd , Matthew Robert Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Daviess County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Kourtney Nicole Rutledge
Defendant:
Daviess County, Kentucky, David Osborne, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gene Favors v. Jeff Woods, et al
as 17-1356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE T. FAVORS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF WOODS, Warden, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Manager, Grievance Section, DAVID M. LEACH, Special Activities Coordinator and others
Jones v. Clark County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Lamarkus T. Jones
Defendant:
Clark County, Kentucky , Frank Doyle , Brett Petty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ali El v. Brandon et al
as 1:2016cv02396
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hakim Ali El
Defendant:
Thomas E. Brandon, Agent Remick, Agent Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane v. Patterson et al
as 1:2016cv02195
Plaintiff:
Kayla Jane
Defendant:
Jeffery K Patterson , Frank G. Jackson , Kevin Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gene Favors v. Jeff Woods, et al
as 16-2213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE T. FAVORS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF WOODS, Warden, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Manager, Grievance Section, DAVID M. LEACH, Special Activities Coordinator and others
Gilmore v. Bush et al
as 3:2016cv01975
Plaintiff:
Sean Gilmore
Defendant:
Officer Bush, John Doe and John and/or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
