Cases 71 - 80 of 181
Cunningham v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission et al
as 5:2018cv00132
Plaintiff:
Paul Cunningham
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission, Tameka Brooks, Brad Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Primus v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission Agency (Akron) et al
as 5:2018cv00129
Plaintiff:
Sharyll Primus
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission Agency (Akron), Tameka Brooks, Brad Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aaron et al v. O'Connor et al
as 1:2017cv00846
Plaintiff:
Frieda Aaron , Patricia Adams , Michelle Agee and others
Defendant:
Maureen O'Connor , Mark R. Schweikert and Christopher McCaughey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Boggs et al
as 0:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
James R. Boggs and Delia M. Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Comm. to Impose Term Limits, et al v. Ohio Ballot Board, et al
as 17-3888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COMMITTEE TO IMPOSE TERM LIMITS ON THE OHIO SUPREME COURT AND TO PRECLUDE SPECIAL LEGAL STATUS FOR MEMBERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE OHIO GENERAL ASSEMBLY, RONALD C. ALBAN, TIM BOGGS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OHIO BALLOT BOARD, JON HUSTED, Member, Ohio Ballot Board, WILLIAM COLEY, Member, Ohio Ballot Board and others
Patterson v. Stark County, Ohio et al
as 5:2017cv01699
Plaintiff:
James Patterson
Defendant:
Stark County, Ohio, George T. Maier, Lt. Ady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Stephan Bogg
as 17-3415
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEPHAN D. BOGGS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00081
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith v. Watson et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Defendant:
Watson, Michael H Watson, Elizabeth P. Deavers and others
Plaintiff:
Smith and Reverend Regina Junior Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.