Cases 71 - 80 of 29,213
Mertle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Cindy M. Mertle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hall v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hall
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Marcum v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00144
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Jason Marcum
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Burks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
James Carrol Burks, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Vanderven v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv11200
Plaintiff:
Michele Vanderven
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
(Court Use Only) SSA Notification - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Harris v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Lynnelle Harris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Adminstration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brooke Tolan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-3385
Plaintiff:
BROOKE A. TOLAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Mohamed v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv11195
Plaintiff:
Sadek Abdulhamid Mohamed
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Loper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00140
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Catherine Loper
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Victor Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-5440
Plaintiff:
VICTOR HARDY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
