Cases 71 - 80 of 83
Daniel #537193 v. Johns et al
as 2:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Phillip Johns, Ben Mercier, Chad Lacount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollmon #222991 v. Woods et al
as 2:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
David Hollmon #222991
Defendant:
Michael Brotoski, Corizon Medical Services and Melissa LaPlaunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel #537193 v. Johns et al
as 2:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Phillip Johns, Ben Mercier, Chad Lacount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Murff v. Corizon Medical Services, et al
as 14-5479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY MURFF
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, ("Corizon"), O. CAMPBELL, Medical Consultate, KELLY CONRAD, Prison Nurse and others
Donald Ferguson v. Corizon Medical Services, et al
as 13-2249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD L. FERGUSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, SQUIRES, Dr. and EDELMAN, Dr.
Bradley Sleighter v. Kent County Jail Admin., et al
as 13-1754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADLEY KEITH SLEIGHTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KENT COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES
Driver v. Sator et al
as 3:2013cv00364
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lynn Driver
Defendant:
Paul Alexander, Corizon Medical Services and Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Schofield et al
as 1:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Harrison
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Bruce Westbrooks, Corizon Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Colson et al
as 3:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dotson
Defendant:
Roland Colson , (f/n/u) Ford , (f/n/u) Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Colson et al
as 3:2013mc00005
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dotson
Defendant:
Roland Colson, (f/n/u) Ford, (f/n/u) Gibbs and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
