Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Rittner, Sr. v. Carr et al
as 2:2011cv00826
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Rittner, Sr.
Defendant:
Paul Weidman, Kenneth Williams, Anita Marie Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Murray et al
as 1:2011cv12564
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Defendant:
Christopher M Murray, Michael J. Talbot and Kurtis T. Wilder
Williams v. Universal Music Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv11971
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Inc. , Motown Record Corporation , Universal Motown Republic Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nathaniel Hatchett v. City of Detroit, et al
as 10-1718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL MAURICE HATCHETT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS, COUNTY OF MACOMB and others
Stefan v. Olson et al
as 1:2010cv00671
Plaintiff:
Carol Stefan
Defendant:
Ed Olson, gary utt, tim wert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffmeyer v. Collins et al
as 1:2009cv02578
Plaintiff:
Samuel D. Hoffmeyer
Defendant:
Terry Collins, Kenneth Williams M.D. and Brian Cain R.N.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2009cv02426
Petitioner:
Kenneth Williams
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams et al v. Logistics Services Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00888
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams and Donna Williams
Defendant:
Logistics Services Inc., Logistics Services Inc., Monte D. Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. Kenneth Williams
as 09-3123
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
