Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bobby Green v. Metropolitan Police Department, et al
as 09-5689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY D. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, HOWARD WRIGHT, Officer, Metro Park Police, J. SPRAY, Officer, Metro Park Police and others
Resendiz v. Mills et al
as 1:2008cv01239
Plaintiff:
Miguel Resendiz
Defendant:
Tommy Mills, Larry Seay, Myrna Bickers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bobby Green v. Metropolitan Police Department, et al
as 08-6176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY D. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, HOWARD WRIGHT, Officer, Metro Park Police, J. SPRAY, Officer, Metro Park Police and others
Mario Khalil v. Larry Seay, et al
as 08-5932
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO I. KHALIL
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY W. SEAY, Food Director, VIRGINIA HOPPER, Kitchen Stewardess, KAYE MOORE, Kitchen Stewardess and others
Bobby Green v. Metropolitan Police Department, et al
as 08-5585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY D. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, HOWARD WRIGHT, Officer, Metro Park Police, J. SPRAY, Officer, Metro Park Police and others
Seay v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 2:2008cv11770
Plaintiff:
Luke Seay
Defendant:
GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Seay v. Thomas
as 5:2008cv00980
Petitioner:
John Seay
Respondent:
Jacqueline Thomas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
