Cases 81 - 90 of 1,225
Wade #434839 v. Braman, et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Dione Andre Wade #434839
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Kristie Marie Van Harn and Melinda Braman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Killian v. King et al
as 2:2023cv11577
Plaintiff:
Travor Austin Killian and Trevor Austin Killian
Defendant:
Mat King, St. Clair County Sheriff's Department, Port Huron Police Department and others
Simpson v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Paul Simpson
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Jones #637399 v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jones #637399
Defendant:
C. Smith, J. Basye, Unknown Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estes v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv11492
Plaintiff:
Larry Wendell Estes, Larry Kush and Little Larry
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Bonham #680736 v. Laurain et al
as 1:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Kevin Emanuel Bonham #680736
Defendant:
Unknown Laurain, Michigan Department of Corrections and Corizon Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loomis v. Bay County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv11511
Plaintiff:
Timothy Loomis
Defendant:
Bay County Sheriff's Department and Department of Corrections, State of Michigan
Price #925727 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Jamon Price #925727
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington, R. Rewerts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fellhauer v. King et al
as 4:2023cv10776
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Fellhauer
Defendant:
Mat King, St. Clair County Jail, State of Michigan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
