Cases 81 - 90 of 194
In re: Derrick Anthony Strahorn
as 2:2018mc00015
Respondent:
Derrick Anthony Strahorn
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Sweeting v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 1:2018cv00029
Petitioner:
Derrick Sweeting
Respondent:
Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sweeting v. Schweigtzer et al
as 1:2017cv00727
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sweeting
Defendant:
Thomas Schweigtzer, Husbard, Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv00686
Petitioner:
Derrick Baldwin
Respondent:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baldwin v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00885
Petitioner:
Derrick Baldwin
Respondent:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rittenberry v. Parnell et al
as 2:2017cv00804
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Rittenberry
Defendant:
Parnell, Eathan Rittenhouse, Hatfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2017cv00774
Plaintiff:
Derrick Justice
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Thomas v. Papa John's International, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00411
Defendant:
It's Only Downtown Pizza II Inc., Michael Hutmier, Papa John's International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Thomas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Flonery v. United States of America et al
as 4:2017cv01068
Plaintiff:
Derrick Flonery
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons Northeast Region and Federal Correctional Institution Milan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheatt et al v. City of East Cleveland et al
as 1:2017cv00377
Defendant:
City of East Cleveland , Michael C. Perry , Vincent K. Johnstone and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Wheatt and Laurese Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
