Cases 81 - 90 of 198
Bartlett v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 1:2018cv00157
Plaintiff:
Angel Bartlett
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1109
Rosario #247823 v. Health Care (MDOC) et al
as 1:2017cv00825
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Rosario #247823
Defendant:
Health Care (MDOC), Kent County Correctional Facility and Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero-Lara v. Kent County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Romero-Lara
Defendant:
Kent County Sheriff's Department and Lawrence A. Stelma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00411
Plaintiff:
Saabir Abdullah
Defendant:
United States of America, Michigan, State of and Kent County Child Support Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Abdullah v. Quist et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Saabir Abdullah
Defendant:
George Jay Quist, Kent County Courthouse, Kent County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Napoleon Hartsfield v. Lawrence Stelma, et al
as 17-1001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAPOLEON HARTSFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
LAWRENCE A. STELMA, Sheriff, KENT, COUNTY OF, DEPUTY D. SIGNS and others
Abdullah v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv01290
Plaintiff:
Saabir Abdullah
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Obama, Michigan, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv13727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hartsfield #207201 v. Stelma et al
as 1:2016cv01135
Plaintiff:
Napoleon Hartsfield #207201
Defendant:
Larry Stelma, Kent, County of, D. Signs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2016cv01056
Plaintiff:
Saabir Abdullah
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1, Grand Rapids Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
