Cases 81 - 90 of 1,879
Brown-Pegues v. Meissner et al
as 1:2023cv12615
Plaintiff:
Jerry Brown-Pegues
Defendant:
Jeffrey Meissner, Ken Van Ells, Mari Beth Zeller and others
Hill v. Law
as 2:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
Shawn Wayne Hill
Respondent:
Jacob Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Karen Arwood, et al v. Hamblen County Jail, et al
as 23-5883
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREN ARWOOD and RAYMOND ARWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
HAMBLEN COUNTY JAIL, ESCO JARNAGIN, Sheriff, TERESA LAWS, Captain and others
Smith v. Rickel et al
as 2:2023cv12538
Plaintiff:
Michelle Smith
Defendant:
John M. Rickel, The Rickel law firm P.C. and Association Dues Assurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Prentice v. Newrez, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv12364
Plaintiff:
Glenn-Michael Prentice, Sr
Defendant:
Newrez, LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Trott Law, P.C., Marcy Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Quannah Harris v. Secretary of State for Tennessee, et al
as 23-5833
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUANNAH L. HARRIS, dba Last Minute Cuts, School of Barbering and Cosmetology
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TENNESSEE, Administrative Procedures Division and MATTIELYN B. WILLIAMS, Administrative Law Judge
Hickman v. Bowles et al
as 1:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Rickey Allen Hickman
Respondent:
Lee Bowles, William Haywood, Jame Tucker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. United States Federal Government Local Cuyahoga County State of Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv01799
Plaintiff:
Gerald Kenneth Phillips
Defendant:
United States Federal Government Local Cuyahoga County State of Ohio, Cuyahoga County Sheriff Department U.S. Federal Local Government, City of Parma Pilot Project and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobronski v. Russo et al
as 2:2023cv12288
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
Anthony J. Russo, Jr. Doing business as The Russo Firm, Anthony John Russo, Jr. Doing business as RP Law LLC, Matthew A. Dolman P.A. Doing business as Dolman Law Group and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
