Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 301
Kevin Tetreau v. Willie Smith
as 14-2260
Petitioner - Appellant: KEVIN TETREAU
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIE SMITH, Warden, Warden
Hogans #215846 v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00988
Petitioner: Robert Hogans #215846
Respondent: Willie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robert Sango v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 14-2173
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT D. SANGO
Defendant - Appellee: DANIEL H. HEYNS, DAPHNE M. JOHNSON, JAMES MACEACHERN and others
In re: Kareem Rhodes
as 14-2150
Movant: In re: KAREEM RHODES
Respondent: WILLIE SMITH, Warden
John Doe 1, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 14-2116
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Defendant - Appellee: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICK SNYDER, DANIEL H. HEYNS and others
Richards #641715 et al v. Heyns et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00908
Plaintiff: Kyle B. Richards #641715 and James Gilde #459854
Defendant: Daniel Heyns, Willie Smith, Erica Huss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson #130169 v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00878
Petitioner: Chester Patterson #130169
Respondent: Willie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Masalmani v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv13001
Petitioner: Ihab Masalmani
Respondent: Willie Smith
Stanley Denhof v. Michigan, State of, et al
as 14-1960
Plaintiff - Appellant: STANLEY GENE DENHOF
Defendant - Appellee: MICHIGAN, STATE OF, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of Prisons and others
Sean Ryan v. Unknown Norwood, et al
as 14-1955
Plaintiff - Appellant: SEAN MICHAEL RYAN
Defendant - Appellee: UNKNOWN NORWOOD, Deputy, C. O. LEWIS, Grievance Coordinator, WILLIE SMITH, Warden, named as W. Smith and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?