Cases 81 - 90 of 89,103
Lawrence v. Leeds
as 3:2024cv00679
Petitioner:
Terrance Lawrence
Respondent:
Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Titan Cloud Software, LLC v. Moore
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Titan Cloud Software, LLC
Defendant:
Clay Moore
Intervenor:
Protean Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Navarrete v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02371
Petitioner:
Jesus Navarrete
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Yates v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Nancy Renee Yates
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hast v. Wild Hawk Wild Life LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02368
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Hast
Defendant:
Wild Hawk Wild Life LLC and Derrick Times
HEPSCO, Inc. v. United States Stove Company
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
HEPSCO, Inc. an Illinois corporation doing business as Professional Sales & Service
Defendant:
United States Stove Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Satterfield v. Lauderdale
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Margaret Hill Satterfield
Defendant:
Angie K. Lauderdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
McCroskey v. The Robinette Company
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gary McCroskey
Defendant:
The Robinette Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
