Cases 1 - 10 of 722
Richardson et al. v. Jawahar et al.
as 1:2024cv00980
Defendant:
Beauty Generations Fund I, LP, Siddharth Jawahar, Fabian Urquijo and others
Plaintiff:
Kathryn A. Richardson, Joanne Holiday, Elie Merheb and others
Clemans v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Clemans
Defendant:
J. Scarborough, Brandon Finch, Amber Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Leah Joy Ward
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoemaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Michelle Shoemaker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips, Tennessee Department of Correction and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2024cv01527
Plaintiff:
Joan Johnson
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and corrections, Lebanon Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
John Doe v. United States Probation Office, Eastern District o, et al
as 24-5314
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE, LAWSON BURROW, Officer, AMBER WILSON, Officer and others
Smith v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02751
Plaintiff:
Amber Smith
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robertson v. Hatfield et al
as 3:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewan Robertson
Defendant:
Gary Hatfield and Amber L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02636
Plaintiff:
Amber Lynn Brown
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taper v. Tabor et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taper
Defendant:
Jon Tabor, Tammy Shelton, Amber Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
