Cases 1 - 10 of 1,873
Altman et al v. Lento Law Firm et al
as 2:2024cv11440
Plaintiff:
Keith Altman and The Law Office of Keith Altman
Defendant:
Lento Law Firm, Joseph D Lento, Lento Law Group, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Storck v. Law Enforcement et al
as 5:2024cv11384
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Storck
Defendant:
Law Enforcement, Detroit Edison Energy Company, Attorneys, Lawyers and Hospitals and others
Serrant v. Perlman et al
as 4:2024cv11353
Plaintiff:
Crystal Serrant
Defendant:
Jeffrey Perlman, Law Offices of Jeffrey Perlman, Akiva E. Goldman and others
The Health Law Partners, P.C. v. Gonzales
as 2:2024cv11332
Plaintiff:
The Health Law Partners, P.C.
Defendant:
Michael Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
The Health Law Partners, P.C. v. Gonzales
as 2:2024cv11331
Plaintiff:
The Health Law Partners, P.C.
Defendant:
Michael Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Law v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02648
Plaintiff:
Andrew Law, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dimitar Petlechkov v. Michael Stengel
as 24-5483
Plaintiff:
DIMITAR PETLECHKOV
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. STENGEL, dba Stengel Law Firm, P.C.
Robert Annabel, II v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1425
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, official and personal capacity, named as Heidi Washington, JEREMY BUSH, Deputy Director, official and personal capacity, ASSISTANT DEPUTY WARDEN MCKINNEY, official and personal capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
