Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Vazquez et al. v. LULO Enterprises, LLC, et al.
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
David Vazquez and Joanna Rodriguez
Defendant:
LULO Enterprises, LLC doing business as LULO Kitchen & Juice Bar and Mario Montoya
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
George #827005 v. Montoya
as 1:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith George #827005
Defendant:
Unknown Montoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #701358 v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Martell Jones #701358
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Kenneth McKee, David Dawdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanca Solis-Romero, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3199
Petitioner:
BLANCA LIDIA SOLIS-ROMERO and BRITANY NICOLE MONTOYA-SOLIS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Jaime Montoya-Sancen v. James Corrigan
as 23-1150
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAIME MONTOYA-SANCEN
Respondent:
JAMES CORRIGAN
Montoya v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Tomas Montoya
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montoya v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2023cv10125
Plaintiff:
Jose Montoya
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Rashada #493950 v. Odungua et al
as 1:2022cv01017
Plaintiff:
Webster Rashada #493950
Defendant:
Unknown Odungua, Unknown Rees, Unknown Montoya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Watson #486299 v. Rees et al
as 1:2022cv00957
Plaintiff:
Anthony Watson #486299
Defendant:
Unknown Rees, Unknown Montoya and Unknown Cassel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
