Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Zelesnik v. Massie et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Defendant:
Greene County Jail, Yellow Springs, Ohio, Dale Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00355
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Primm et al v. Clark County, KY et al
as 5:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Melissa Montgomery, Harold Little, Dr. Everson and others
Plaintiff:
Tresina Primm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stormborn Technologies LLC v. Carlson Software, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00065
Plaintiff:
Stormborn Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Carlson Software, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Moler v. Mabe et al
as 6:2019cv00203
Petitioner:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Respondent:
Jason Sickler, Christopher Mabe, C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alterra American Insurance Company v. Kentucky Retirement Systems et al
as 3:2019cv00020
Defendant:
David Peden, Timothy Longmeyer, Bobby Henson and others
Plaintiff:
Alterra American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Canterbury v. Bertis Carlson Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00169
Defendant:
Bertis Carlson Trucking, Inc. and Charles L. Holmes
Plaintiff:
Ashley Canterbury
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Franklin Canterbury, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cavezza v. Metcalf et al
as 5:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Jessica Cavezza
Defendant:
Emma Metcalf, Yvonne Chabot, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00143
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
