Cases 1 - 10 of 10
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO (UAW) and UAW Local 6000 et al v. McClelland et al
as 2:2020cv12433
Plaintiff:
Michigan Public Employees Local 517M, Service Employees International Union, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO (UAW) and UAW Local 6000, Council 25, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and others
Defendant:
Jase Bolger, James Barrett, Jeff Steffel and others
Amicus Curiae:
Mackinac Center Legal Foundation and National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cyrus v. Gaber et al
as 3:2019cv01754
Defendant:
Opportunities for Ohioans with Disabilities, Bureau of Services for the Visually Impaired, Kevin Miller, Sharon Gaber and others
Plaintiff:
James Cyrus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DeMaria v. City of Bellevue et al
as 3:2016cv01947
Plaintiff:
Susan DeMaria
Defendant:
City of Bellevue and Local 2571, Ohio Council 8 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Cochran et al v. Jefferson County Public Schools Board of Education et al
as 3:2015cv00751
Plaintiff:
Jeannean Cochran , Paula Barr , Cherri Beckhart and others
Defendant:
Jefferson County Public Schools Board of Education , Donna M. Hargens , American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Indiana-Kentucky Organizing Committee 962 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michigan Council 25 of the Ame, et al v. City of Detroit, Michigan
as 14-1211
Debtor:
In re: CITY OF DETROIT
Appellant:
MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO and SUB-CHAPTER 98, CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES
Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT
Interested Party - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MICHIGAN and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: Michigan Council 25, et al v. n
as 14-101
Petitioner:
MICHIGAN COUNCIL 25 OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO and SUB-CHAPTER 98, CITY OF DETROIT RETIREES
Carrie Schlaud, et al v. Rick Snyder, et al
as 12-1105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARRIE SCHLAUD, EDWARD J. GROSS, NORA I. GROSS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, in her Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan, ISMAEL AHMED, in his Official Capacity as the Director of Michigan's Department of Human Services, INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA and others
Defendant:
MICHIGAN HOME BASED CHILD CARE COUNSEL and RICK SNYDER, in his Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan
Ohio Council 8 American Federa, et al v. Secretary of State Jennifer Br, et al
as 10-4006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OHIO COUNCIL 8 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, HONORABLE NADINE ALLEN, HONORABLE PETER J. CORRIGAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF STATE JENNIFER BRUNNER, In her official capacity as Secretary of State of Ohio, BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO, BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO and others
Ohio Council 8 American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO et al v. Brunner et al
as 1:2010cv00504
Plaintiff:
Ohio Council 8 American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO , Nadine Allen , Peter J. Corrigan and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Brunner, Board of Elections of Hamilton County, Ohio, Board of Elections of Cuyahoga County, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schlaud et al v. Granholm et al
as 1:2010cv00147
Plaintiff:
Carrie Schlaud, Edward J. Gross, Nora I. Gross and others
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Granholm, Ismael Ahmed, Michigan Home Based Child Care Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
