Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
David Sifuentes, III v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 23-2047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, III
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC
Godwin v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 2:2023cv02488
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T INTEGRATED DISABILITY SERVICE CENTER and AT&T SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
Theresa Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shenoda v. I.C. System, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
Mina Shenoda
Defendant:
I.C. System, Inc., AFNI, Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AT&T Mobility LLC et al v. Shoukry et al
as 2:2021cv00436
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC dba AT&T Mobility, AT&T Mobility LLC, Cricket Wireless LLC and others
Defendant:
Tamer Shoukry and John Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00477
Plaintiff:
Richard Armstrong
Defendant:
Kathleen Mayo, AT&T Mobility LLC and Spectrum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pettit v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 5:2013cv00205
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Pettit
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC , AT&T Mobility Services, LLC , AT&T Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
