Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Tink et al v. DEWITTE et al
as 2:2021cv10957
Defendant:
BRIAN HENDERSON, JEROME BOL, MANU KOTHARI and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Tink and Retail Simply LLC Doing business as inGENIUS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Receiver:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mason v. Barbier's Tavern, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02175
Defendant:
Barbier's Tavern, Inc. and Frank A. Root, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Sara Mason
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Benjamin Caulton v. Bobbie Smith, et al
as 16-1494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN CAULTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBIE SMITH, Deputy Warden, D. BERRY, Officer (Division Unit), J. KITCHEN, Hearing Investigator/Grievance Coordinator and others
Caulton #246805 v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv00249
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Caulton #246805
Defendant:
Bobbie Smith, T. Berry, B. Kitchen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown #181534 v. Berghuis et al
as 1:2012cv00458
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kirk Brown #181534
Defendant:
Mary Berghuis , S. Walton , Unknown Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Berghuis et al
as 2:2012cv10881
Plaintiff:
Ronald Brown
Defendant:
Mary Berghuis, S Walton, Baker and others
Render v. Hall et al
as 1:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
David Render
Defendant:
Corey Hall, Lawrence E. Barbiere and Jay D. Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaFountain #171248 v. Harry et al
as 1:2010cv00943
Plaintiff:
Wayne Earl LaFountain #171248
Defendant:
Shirlee Harry, Brett J. Barbier, Sharon K. Wells-Finos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyles #132720 v. Crosby et al
as 1:2010cv00528
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Lyles #132720
Defendant:
Delores Crosby, M. Barnett, Richard B. Stapleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
