Cases 1 - 10 of 22
ANDUJAR et al v. HUB GROUP TRUCKING, INC.
as 2:2024cv02296
Plaintiff:
JORGE ANDUJAR and FRANKLIN PENA BATISTA
Defendant:
Hub Group Trucking Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Flores v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ronnys Batista Flores
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Malcolm Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Luis Nivar Batista v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3975
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO NIVAR BATISTA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
State of Ohio, ex rel Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv02700
Defendant:
Aaron Michael Jones, Jovita Migdaris Cedeno Luna, Andrea Horvath and others
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio, ex rel Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Batista v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02517
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Victor Batista
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00491
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Batista v. Tremont Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00361
Defendant:
Sherman DeLozier and Tremont Enterprises, LLC
Plaintiff:
Stan Batista
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00320
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peres et al v. Third Federal Savings And Loan Association of Cleveland
as 1:2018cv00018
Defendant:
Third Federal Savings and Loan Association of Cleveland
Plaintiff:
Washington Peres and Rosa Maria Batista Peres
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Batista v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 2:2016mc50277
Plaintiff:
Kenai Batista
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Movant:
Jatco USA, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
