Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Putman v. Tuscola, County of et al
as 1:2023cv10427
Plaintiff:
William E. Putman, II
Defendant:
Tuscola County, Correctional Healthcare Companies, LLC, Joseph Natole, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Medilodge of Taylor
as 2:2022cv11919
Plaintiff:
Brian Harry Marshall
Defendant:
Medilodge of Taylor
Mounts et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00086
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Mounts, Larry Epling, Mabel Epling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Harris v. Eppinger
as 5:2020cv02156
Petitioner:
Kermit Brian Harris and Brian Keith Harris
Respondent:
Lashann Eppinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arnett v. Premier Holdings Group
as 3:2018cv00376
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A Arnett
Defendant:
Premier Holdings Group, Adam Pasternak, Brian Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hughes v. Detroit et al
as 2:2017cv13342
Defendant:
Brian Harris, City Detroit, Brandon Seed and others
Plaintiff:
Steele Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keesya Ross v. Teleperformance USA Inc, et al
as 14-4134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEESYA D. ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
TELEPERFORMANCE USA INC, MYNETTE MURRELL, TROY NABOORS and others
Ross v. Teleperformance USA Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Keesya D Ross
Defendant:
Teleperformance USA Inc, Mynette Murrell, Troy Naboors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Harris v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2007cv01302
Petitioner:
Brian Harris
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Collins et al
as 1:2007cv01920
Plaintiff:
Kermit Brian Harris
Defendant:
Terry J Collins, Kenneth D. Williams, Brain Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
