Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Gibson v. Durfey et al
as 2:2022cv03792
Plaintiff:
Klain Gibson
Defendant:
Officer M. Durfey, Officer J. Smith, Officer E. Fain and others
Interested Party:
ip state of ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02678
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Alexander
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Warner v. Alexander
as 2:2022cv02029
Petitioner:
Eddie Warner
Respondent:
Anthony C. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rickey Alexander v. Douglas Fender
as 21-3708
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKEY C. ALEXANDER
Respondent / Appellee:
DOUGLAS FENDER, Warden
Hightower v. Shelby County Corrections Center et al
as 2:2020cv02643
Defendant:
Jerry Scott, Anthony C. Alexander, Michael House and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Michael Hightower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gorby et al v. Alexander et al
as 1:2018cv01404
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, Tristin J. Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Karen S. Gorby and Daniel J. Gorby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Alexander v. Lake Erie Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv00591
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Alexander
Defendant:
Lake Erie Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. State of Ohio
as 1:2017cv00018
Petitioner:
Michael C. Alexander
Respondent:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alexander v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv01863
Plaintiff:
Craig C Alexander
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Payne et al v. Pummill et al
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lowell N. Payne, Clifford L. Rucker, James Robinson and others
Defendant:
Cathy Pummill, Jane Doe Park, Amy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
