Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Clawfoot Supply, LLC v. Butler
as 2:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Clawfoot Supply, LLC doing business as Signature Hardware
Defendant:
Matthew C. Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. Amilcar Butler
as 22-5877
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
AMILCAR C. BUTLER
Matthew Butler v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
as 20-5752
Defendant / Appellee:
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW C. BUTLER
Amilcar Butler v. USA
as 20-5160
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMILCAR C. BUTLER
Butler v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00094
Plaintiff:
Matthew C. Butler
Defendant:
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler v. Haslam et al
as 3:2019cv00416
Defendant:
Roberta Nevil Kustoff, Richard Montgomery, Tim Gobble and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert C. Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northwest Ohio Carpenters, Millwrights & Pile Drivers Supplemental Pension Plan v. Pena et al
as 3:2017cv02546
Plaintiff:
Northwest Ohio Carpenters, Millwrights & Pile Drivers Supplemental Pension Plan
Defendant:
Mandy A. Pena and Anette C. Butler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ohio Carpenters' Pension Plan v. Pena et al
as 3:2017cv02543
Plaintiff:
Ohio Carpenters' Pension Plan
Defendant:
Mandy A. Pena , Judy Pena, Manuel Pena Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
USA v. Amilcar Butler
as 17-5371
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
AMILCAR C. BUTLER
USA, et al v. Real Properties and Premises, et al
as 16-5666
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
REAL PROPERTIES AND PREMISES KNOWN AS 323 FORREST PARK DRIVE, UNIT 2-4, MADISON, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE and 808 NORTH FIFTH STREET, NASHVILLE, DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Appellant:
AMILCAR C. BUTLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
