Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10540
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Doe et al v. Michigan State University Board of Trustees et al
as 1:2018cv00829
Defendant: Kathie Klages, Lawrence Nassar and Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Plaintiff: Jane JJF Doe, Jane CAO Doe and Jane LAM Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
WSPTN Corp. et al v. Tennessee Department of Health, Council for Hearing Instrument Specialists et al
as 3:2015cv00840
Plaintiff: WSPTN Corp. , The Hearing Group, LLC , Bell Hearing Aids, Inc. and others
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Health, Council for Hearing Instrument Specialists, Thomas Stewart, Randy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Procter & Gamble Company v. CAO Group, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00337
Plaintiff: Procter & Gamble Company
Defendant: CAO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Rijun Cao v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-3210
Petitioner: RIJUN CAO
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Mahamed v. BAC Home Loans Serv LP et al
as 3:2011cv00619
Plaintiff: Flarrie Kimberley Mahamed
Defendant: BAC Home Loans Serv LP , Bank of America, N.A. , Rubin Lublin Suarez Serrano, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CAO Group, Incorporated v. Federal-Mogul Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv11354
Plaintiff: CAO Group, Incorporated
Defendant: Federal-Mogul Corporation, Federal-Mogul Corporation and Universal Scientific Industrial Corporation, Limited
Counter Claimant: Federal-Mogul Corporation and Federal-Mogul Corporation
Counter Defendant: CAO Group, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?