Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Cordrey v. TechSolve, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Debra Cordrey
Defendant:
TechSolve, Inc. and Daniel Catalano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Catalano v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02041
Plaintiff:
MARIA CATALANO
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Connie Reguli v. James Catalano, et al
as 22-5539
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONNIE LYNN REGULI
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES P. CATALANO, ROBERT HASSELL and DAVID A. KOZLOWSKI
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Catalano as Guardian and Conservator for Robert Catalano
as 2:2021cv12583
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Carolyn Catalano as Guardian and Conservator for Robert Catalano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Reguli v. Catalano et al
as 3:2021cv00713
Plaintiff:
Connie Reguli
Defendant:
James Catalano, Robert Hassell and David Kozlowski
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Catalano v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03680
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michelle Catalano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Catalano v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
as 1:2018cv02877
Defendant:
Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Catalano
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Steven Anderson v. Michael Donahue, et al
as 15-6215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN L. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL DONAHUE, Warden, MS. DUNCAN, Warden's Secretary, MR. A. SHARP, K-9 Corrections Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
